Home »
Blog » Page 68
Improvement Insights Blog
Latest Posts
Charles Duhigg, in his book Smarter, Faster, Better, describes a condition he calls “information blindness.” When faced with too much information, people shut down because they don’t know what to do with it.
I find this is true in most companies. They collect tons of data, but can’t “winnow” the data down into the vital few bits of information that would transform their business. What I invariably do is use PivotTables, control charts and Pareto charts to find the “vital few” bits that tell us exactly where to find and fix the problems that cause over half of the waste, rework and lost profits.
Continue Reading "Information Blindness"
Posted by Jay Arthur in Six Sigma.
A customer called today confused about her data. She wanted to draw a control chart and thought the data might have a binomial or poisson distribution. She thought it was attribute data. She’d used the QI Macros Control Chart Wizard to create a control chart of her data and it chose an XmR chart. She wasn’t sure that was right. When I asked her what kind of data she had, she said, “write-offs”.
Write-offs are money, plain and simple. Money is variable (a.k.a. continuous or measured) data.
I explained that to her and suggested she stop worrying about what kind of distribution she has and just look at her data.
Continue Reading "Binomial, Poisson, Attribute, Continuous Data Control Chart Confusion"
Posted by Jay Arthur in QI Macros, Six Sigma.
Children seem to like the look of laundry detergent packets, so they eat them and go to the emergency room.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is designed to ferret out these kinds of problems in advance.
Failure Mode: Someone (adult or child) mistakes them for candy and eats one.
Effects: Vomiting and even death
Could this simple analysis have prevented this problem before it got to market? Maybe.
Learn more at www.qimacros.com/lean-six-sigma-articles/fmea/
Continue Reading "Detergent Packets Poison FMEA"
Posted by Jay Arthur in QI Macros, Six Sigma.
You can use Excel’s data formatting, commenting and filtering tools to help visualize and clarify your data.
Highlighting: Select cells and click on Home-Fill Color to highlight cells:

Commenting: To add comments to any cell, click on Data-Insert Comment:

Subset: To select a subset of your data, click on Data-Filter and select the desired content:

Excel will simplify and streamline your data for ease of analysis:

Excel has many powerful data exploration and visualization tools. Play with them!
Continue Reading "Data Visualization and Exploration In Excel"
Posted by Jay Arthur in Excel, Six Sigma.
Like a lot of people, I used to put my taxes off until the last minute. Then I’d grind away for a whole weekend getting the paperwork together and entered into my tax software. Boy that was dumb.
In the last few years I’ve started buying my tax software early and inputting every W-2 and 1099 when it comes in. When the last bit of paperwork comes in, I compare this year with last year, fix any glitches and I’m ready to file.
This is a Lean approach to handling my taxes. I handle everything, just in time, as it comes in.
Continue Reading "Lean for Tax Preparation"
Posted by Jay Arthur in Lean.
The American Statistical Association (ASA) has issued a statement about statistical significance and p values. It quotes ScienceNews article from 2010: “It’s science’s dirtiest secret: The ‘scientific
method’ of testing hypotheses by statistical analysis stands on a flimsy foundation.”
Six Sigma spends a lot of time on hypothesis testing using p values, but our use of p values may lack the rigor required. The ASA states: By itself, a p-value does not provide a good measure of evidence regarding a model or hypothesis.
Continue Reading "p value’s Dirty Little Secret"
Posted by Jay Arthur in Six Sigma.
Microsoft added a box and whisker plot to Excel 2016, but it’s not everything you might hope for. Here’s an Excel 2016 box and whisker plot:

You might notice that the whiskers have a crossbar on the end. It seems to have a spare “x” in the middle of each box and it’s a little hard to see where the median is. And there are unnecessary gridlines that are considered chartjunk. It does, however, show the outlier below the first box.
Here’s what the QI Macros Box and Whisker Plot looks like:

The whiskers are whiskers. The median is easily visible.
Continue Reading "What’s Wrong with the New Excel 2016’s Box and Whisker Plot?"
Posted by Jay Arthur in Excel, QI Macros, Six Sigma, Statistics.
I first learned how to draw Pareto charts by hand using engineering paper if you can believe it. Our trainers were very specific about how they were to be drawn. One of the earliest references I can find is Kaoru Ishikawa’s Guide to Quality Control. Here’s the correct way to draw a Pareto chart using data from Ishikawa’s book:

The bars should be touching and the cumulative percentage line should go from corner to corner of the first bar.
Unfortunately, most Pareto charts drawn by computer look like the following one, bars not touching and cumulative line running out of the center of the top of the first bar.
Continue Reading "The Correct Way to Draw a Pareto Chart"
Posted by Jay Arthur in QI Macros, Six Sigma.
Customers invariably want three things from any supplier; they want you to be better, faster and cheaper that your competition and your past performance. It’s vital to find out what they want. Sometimes it’s as easy as asking: “What can we do better?” and then listening carefully to the response.
One way to figure out what customers want is to develop a voice of the customer (VOC) diagram and keep it updated.

Along the left-hand side are the customer’s requirements for better, faster and cheaper. The goal is to capture exactly what they say in their language. Then translate what they say into business changes that deliver on those requirements.
Continue Reading "What Do Customers Want?"
Posted by Jay Arthur in QI Macros, Six Sigma.
Every businesses wastes a quarter to a third of total expenses 1) fixing stuff that shouldn’t be broken (rework) and 2) throwing away stuff that can’t be fixed (scrap). There are four main costs of poor quality:
- Internal failures that cause rework and scrap.
- External failures that increase returns (to be reworked or scrapped), billing adjustments, concessions and customer complaints.
- Inspection costs of incoming materials,inspection of work in process and final inspection and testing.
- Prevention costs (i.e, Lean Six Sigma)
Inspection, failure, rework and scrap can easily devour much of a companies time and money. Preventing these problems is far less expensive, but requires focus and dedication to eliminate mistakes and errors.
Continue Reading "Cost of Poor Quality"
Posted by Jay Arthur in Six Sigma.