Measurement Variation |
||
| home
· products
· services · search
· |
||
| NAVIGATION | |||||
|
Jay Arthur
Copyright © 2011
|
One of the "five M's" in root cause analysis is measurement. Measurement error can reject good products and accept bad products. Measurement error can be split into two main causes: equipment (i.e., gage) causes and process (i.e., appraiser) causes. The QI Macros Gage R&R template can help you evaluate your measurement system. Gage R&RThe Gage R&R template offers three main ways to evaluate your measurement system: You'll find instructions for completing a GageR&R study on the first sheet tab in the template:
The first step is to pick a gage to evaluate, two or three appraisers and five to ten parts using these guidelines. Important: the five-to-ten parts must span the range or tolerance you are trying to measure. If the parts are identical (i.e., no variation), all of the error will fall on equipment and appraisers.
Then, at random, have your appraisers measure each of the parts. Do all ten for the first trial and then, in a different order, do the second and or third trials. Enter your data into the Gage R&R worksheet. NOTE: Even though you measure the parts in a different order for each trial, you still input the measurements for each part in the same column. For example, part 1 might be measured first in trial 1, eighth in trial 2 and fourth in trial 3 but you still input the measurements for that part in the same column C. In the worksheet below I entered the Ford test data from c:\qimacros\testdata\AIAG SPC.xls. There are 10 parts, three appraisers and three trials.
Number of Distinct Categories
Average and Range Method Most Gage R&R users rely on the Average and Range method. Unfortunately, most people don't like the insights they receive. Below are the results sent in by one customer. First, there weren't enough distinct categories (NDC = 4). This throws suspicion on the other results, but %R&R is greater than 30% which means the gage system needs improvement. %EV is 33.8% and %AV is only 7.3%. This suggests that the problem is with the gage, not the measurement process. Recommended improvements are listed on the Gage R&R template in cells T13:T16.
Specification Tolerance Method
We had one customer who had Six Sigma quality (Cp=2), but their Average and Range method said they're gage system needed improvement. (Your product may be great, but your measurement process can still be suspect.) When they entered the specification tolerance (USL-LSL), however, their measurements were acceptable using the tolerance formulas. ANOVA Method
In either case, %R&R is less than 10% so the measurement system is acceptable. Ford's expected answers to this data are: Measurement Systems Analysis is Easy
One-Day QI Macros Workshop
|
|
|||
|
home | products | services | search | sitemap | QI Macros | Excel SPC Software | SPC Software Free Trial Control Charts | c Chart | np Chart | p Chart | u Chart ImR Chart | XmR Chart | XMedianR Chart | XbarR Chart | XbarS Chart | EWMA Chart Anom Chart | Cusum Chart | Levey Jennings Chart | Moving Average Chart Histograms | Pareto Chart | Scatter Plot | Run Chart Box Whisker Plot | Dot Plot | Multivari Chart Lean Six Sigma Training | Lean Six Sigma Training Denver Lean Six Sigma Consulting | Lean Six Sigma Consulting Denver Lean Six Sigma Training Systems | Do-It-Yourself Lean Six Sigma Training |
|||||